Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Jackie Beatty, M.A. '12, PhD Student

Jackie graduated in 2012 with concentrations in US History and Women & Gender. She is a PhD student at George Mason University.  Her major field is US History; her minor fields are America to 1820 and US Women's and Gender History.  She can be contacted by email.

What are some exciting things happening in your life?

Currently, I am preparing for my oral comprehensive exams which I'll be taking mid-June. After that, the rest of my summer will be devoted to finishing my dissertation prospectus. Then I'll be able to start my dissertation in earnest. It's a strange feeling to finally (well, almost!) reach this point in my education. Both have always seemed so far away, so it's really exciting!

Favorite or recommended history books?

This is a really easy question. My absolute favorite book is Rosemarie Zagarri's Revolutionary Backlash. I read it in my first semester in Dr. Kerrison's American Historiography course. I was writing a paper on republican motherhood, and she suggested it. I had been frustrated with the concept of the "republican mother" since I read Linda Kerber's Women of the Republic in my sophomore year of college. Kerber asserted that the political agency of women derived from their domestic roles as wives and mothers. I was so dissatisfied with that thesis! Zagarri's work fills that hole, demonstrating how women were politically active during the Revolution and in the early republic, often in the same ways as men, despite the fact that they were largely disenfranchised. I was actually advised by my undergraduate mentor to apply to graduate programs to study with historians whose books I admired or whose fields of study I wanted to pursue myself. I followed her advice, and I'm lucky enough to be studying with Prof. Zagarri now!

I'd also recommend Susan Klepp's Revolutionary Conceptions, Barbara Clark Smith's The Freedoms We Lost, Kathleen Brown's Good Wives, Nasty Wenches, and Anxious Patriarchs, Kirsten Fischer's Suspect Relations, Catherine Allgor's Parlor Politics, Seth Rockman's Scraping By, and Seth Cotlar's Tom Paine's America, all for selfish reasons. No offense to all other areas of history, but early America is obviously the best :) Okay, so maybe this wasn't such an easy question...

Finally, I'll give a shameless plug for Dr. Kerrison's first book, Claiming the Pen. It's a common trope that in order to learn to write well, you need to read good writing. I recall one phrase of hers--the "tyranny of the candle," referring to her female subjects writing late into the night, and being thwarted by the dimness and ephemerality of the candle. I wish I had her writing skills! And this doesn't count as sucking up--she's not grading my work anymore :)

Why did you seek an MA in History? Before attending Villanova, what did you have in mind, career-wise, after completing the program?  Did you pursue this?  If not, what changed your mind?

I have wanted to pursue a PhD in order to teach at the college level since my undergraduate advisor at Boston College suggested that I look into graduate study when I was a sophomore. The MA in history is obviously a necessary step in achieving the PhD, and Villanova's program was a great fit for me. After my first week of classes, I decided that I really did want to pursue the PhD (it's something you do have to be sure of before you commit!), so I methodically took classes in my two concentrations and with professors who were both phenomenal scholars and educators. I really benefited from the mentors I had in the department, and I think this is a theme you would hear echoed constantly if you were to poll graduate alumni.

Tell us a bit about your experience applying for PhD programs.

I'm sure I have the most absurd story of any PhD student or professor who might get this question. I had the back luck of being rejected from almost every school to which I applied, and in the eleventh hour, I got off a wait list at my top-choice school. Sometimes the stars really do align! I was waitlisted at another school along with a peer of mine from the program; neither of us got off of the waitlist at that school, but he got into a much better one. I think this just goes to show how random and seemingly arbitrary the admissions process can be. Money, professor availability, research interests, and any number of things can be a factor in admissions committees' decisions. A rejection letter certainly does not mean that a candidate is incompetent or undeserving of obtaining a PhD; often, it is due to another matter entirely that is out of the applicant's control.

Give us a brief description of your PhD candidate duties.

I'm a teaching assistant at George Mason. For the past two years, I've TAed for two different professors in Western Civilization courses. I've graded and led discussions intermittently--this is a big course that is required for all students in Humanities and Social Sciences, so most classes are lecture-based. Next year, I'm hoping to TA for a World Civ class which has more opportunities for student interaction, including weekly discussion groups with smaller class sizes.

Tell us a bit about the research you're doing.

My dissertation will (hopefully!) focus on the differences between the lived experiences and prescribed behaviors of marriage and marital discourse. I will be investigating how things like class, gender, print culture, and the Revolution affected men's and women's ideas about their roles as husbands and wives, particularly in Boston, Philadelphia, and Charleston between 1750 and 1820.

What do you enjoy about being in a PhD program?  And if you’re comfortable sharing this publicly, what would you say are the less desirable aspects of the gig?

Mason's program is incredibly welcoming and friendly, both among faculty and students. I have a great group of peers. We are not competitive with each other. We're really supportive of each other, helping to organize studying sessions, readings, and the occasional social outing to take a break from work! We've formed several groups--writing groups, digital project working groups, etc.--that really give us a chance to get insightful feedback from unintimidating sources! It's great to be a part of a cohort that shares your interests (especially the nerdy ones!) and is rooting for you to get through this difficult process!

Mason's program is also fairly young, especially relative to other PhD programs. The professors who established it years ago integrated several components that they wished they had experienced in their own graduate education. One, for instance, is our bi-monthly colloquium; we hear lectures from local historians, discuss issues of professional development (presenting at conferences, publishing articles, job interviews, alternative careers to academia, etc.), and we get to enjoy a generally congenial environment (there are cookies!). We are also required to take two semesters of Digital History (one on the theoretical side, another on the practice of digital history) which I honestly wouldn't have done if it were not mandated! I'm glad it was, though. I'm hoping to incorporate a few digital tools and methods into my dissertation!

Pursuing a PhD can be a solitary, and therefore an often lonely endeavor. This can be especially difficult when you get to that point in the semester when you realize that there are not enough hours in the day to finish all of your work. My peers at Mason have been great in combatting these difficulties--after all, we're all in the same boat! Venting sessions, happy hours, movie nights, and other outings are ways that we get around the "less desirable aspects" of working toward a PhD. I've also joined a volleyball team, started going to the gym regularly, and taken a few bike rides from my apartment to the National Mall (the benefits of living near a large metropolitan area!). Sometimes you may feel guilty using "study time" to exercise, but breaks from stressful work really are helpful.

How have the knowledge and skills you developed at VU helped you as you’ve continued deeper into academia?

I came to Villanova almost by accident, but I'm incredibly grateful that I did. I know that my experiences in seminar classes, with research papers, working with my peers in the Rofinot lounge, and having incredible mentors has made all the difference in my education. The program prepared me for the workload and the expectations of a PhD program. Several of my current advisors have commented on the depth of my reading in both early America and women's history, and I know that is a testament to the rigorous coursework at Villanova. Before starting my PhD, I had a strong foundation on which to build my learning and research due to the high quality of my Masters coursework.

Do you have any additional background, training, or experience that’s aided you (examples: another degree or certificate, technical skills, language proficiency, etc.)?

None that I can think of at the moment! Mason actually doesn't have a language requirement for students studying U.S. history (not all programs do--make sure to check each department's requirements!).

What would you tell current students who are contemplating seeking a PhD?

First of all, make sure it's for you. Consult with current students, think about your experience in the program at Villanova, and especially talk to your professors about it. They'll be honest with you about the workload, the realities of the job market, and the practicality of pursuing a PhD.

In terms of the actual application process, it's incredibly important to gauge whether you will be a good fit for a particular program before applying. This was something I wish I had known before applying myself. I would suggest contacting program chairs and potential advisors at programs in which you are interested, and if at all possible, schedule visits to meet with them in person. I don't doubt that some of the main reasons I'm at Mason are that the program has a strong faculty in early American women's history, and that I took the time to meet with the program director. She remembered me, she knew and trusted the recommendation of my advisor, and it made a difference in my situation. Personal connections and networking can be critical in academia just as in any other field.

Any other wisdom you’d like to pass on?

Take advantage of all the resources at your disposal at Villanova, especially in the department. As I have said about a million times in this interview, the faculty are incredible, and I continue to be indebted to them for all they have done for me. I know my peers and other alumni feel the same way--we all had a tough time at graduation!


Also, try the sweet potato fries in Connelly. They are delicious, and got us through a number of paper-writing sessions in Rofinot!

No comments:

Post a Comment